ATale of Two Cities

Just today I have watched two very different stories about two very different Michigan cities. The first one in the news was Detriot and then later it was Grand Rapids. The common thread between the two is about getting control of the EMS system and improving its performance.

The situation in Detroit is truly sad and stems from a variety of problems spanning years. At this point the Governor is considering the appointment of an emergency manager while the system faces financial difficulties and now possible privatization. The comment that struck me in the video, however, was when the union president suggested that outsourcing would mean the city loses control of EMS. Is this really a system “in control”?

The story in Grand Rapids is very different. They began looking for control by trying to understand their existing system. What did they already know and how could that help them do a better job? They turned to study habits in their system and employ “System Status Management”. The sucess they found also earned them a local news story, but the tone was very different than the one above.

The question you need to answer is who is really in control of your system? That answer will determine whether the next news story about your service will be more like the one in Detroit or more like Grand Rapids. What is working for you?

3 Comments

  • Ray Mickol says:

    Great article. Unfortunately, as in other places, I am sure the EMS system in Detroit is run by politicians and career bureaucratic that haven’t a clue how to proper run a system. Until politicians can leave their hands off and trust the professionals to do the job they were hired to do we will always have excessive waste ans mismanagement.

  • Skip Kirkwood says:

    Here’s a simple fact. It costs money to provide quality EMS in a community. It is a rare community where “transport reimbursement” will pay for all the pieces of a quality, comprehensive EMS system. This is particularly true where many people are uninsured or under-insured (read “Medicaid”). The EMS system is not the only problem faced by Detroit, but it is symptomatic of the issues faced in what looks a lot like a distressed city.

    If the city wants quality EMS, they have to fund it. If they want to get out of the business, do so – but don’t let the service die a lingering death (because the citizens will, too). “Privatizing” is a temporary fix at best, because if the city can’t make it work, it is unlikely that a private company can make it work in the long term either. Savings from “private sector business practices” will either go towards company profit (a good thing in the private sector) or will come at the expense of patient care.

    Not an easy issue to address!

  • Dan Gerard says:

    I agree with Skip. Regardless of service provider/model, the system has to be adequately funded, with clear expectations spelled out (response time parameters, QA parameters, prevention activities, community education, etc.)

    My heart goes out to the residents of Detroit, the men and women in Detroit F.D. who are providing EMS.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

background image Blogger Img

High Performance EMS

High Performance Emergency Medical Services (HP-EMS) systems provide effective clinical care promoting positive patient outcomes and community wellness while maintaining a focus on improving economic efficiency of the system.  This site is dedicated as a community seeking to increase agency performance by promoting useful information regarding the developing trends and improvements in the efficiency of delivering basic and advanced medical care in the field.

JEMS Talk: Google Hangout

Comments
Luke
What Higher EMS Pay Requires
How about the company you work for makes 800 on one call and you make 600$ after two weeks of work.... And running 50 calls... Let's just be a little more fucking fair here....
2015-08-01 06:06:03
Jake
Static v. Dynamic: A Continuum of Cost
I whole-heartedly agree with Joey, what is our purpose? Why are we here? We are here to provide the best possible care to our patients. Part of best possible care is an expedient time-frame. I've been a dispatcher for 5 years, and I hate seeing my Medics get burned-out, but I hate even more so…
2015-07-20 07:13:24
Marcelo Bahl
Did You Watch ‘Nightwatch’ Last Night?
Hello, work in the EMS system in Brazil and whenever I can, I watch the episodes that leave recording to watch later, you show the reality of day-to-day of your city, which is very good and has no censorship as the shocking images that we see every day, because here everything is censored. One more…
2015-07-15 12:52:18
Jeffrey Hammerstein
Stop Dissing Response Times and Start Dissecting the Argument
I think that the position someone takes on this issue depends entirely on the circumstances of the particular EMS system they have in mind when they consider the question. If we're comparing a 7 minute response time to a 70 minute response time (or infinite as mentioned above), then of course it matters. That's a…
2015-07-03 11:44:45
Dave Shrader
Stop Dissing Response Times and Start Dissecting the Argument
I had meetings recently with a client in an underserved County. They have multiple tax supported volunteer organizations, and a City FD as EMS providers. The system is totally Balkanized with each agency doing it’s own thing. One agency failed to even respond to 66% of its calls last year. So, 66% of the time,…
2015-07-03 08:08:44

Dale Loberger's Discussions


Follow Dale Loberger

FireEMS Blogs eNewsletter

Sign-up to receive our free monthly eNewsletter

LATEST EMS NEWS

HOT FORUM DISCUSSIONS