How Far is Richmond from Jersey City?

Okay, so one answer to the question is 330 miles along I-95. However, I am not referring to their physical distance apart, but rather the enormous distance in their thinking about EMS. Both cities have invested in building impressive systems, they just seem to disagree on the value of their creations.

It has not even been two years since JEMS magazine was lauding Jersey Center Medical Center EMS (JCMCEMS) for achieving an unprecedented five national accreditations after a stunning turnaround that began only back in 2005. By all accounts, JCMCEMS has become a leading EMS service in the last few years that has shown an impressive attention to detail and creativity. Innovations such as accurately positioning units in anticipation of calls have seen a corresponding reduction in response time that has directly contributed to saving lives. Yet in the last few months, JCMCEMS has again begun a fight for its life in keeping a contract it has held for 130 years. The Jersey City mayor, Steve Fulop, has actively campaigned to replace the Jersey City Medical Center as EMS provider with CarePoint Health/McCabe Ambulance Services. What appears to be the issue is that JCMCEMS had charged the city for providing the service in order to upgrade the overall system while McCabe now offers to pay the city $2.6M for the privilege of operating the service. The end of this story hasn’t been written yet, but the mere fact it is still an open question should send shudders down the spines of any EMS managers that are planning and building toward a new health care future.

The Richmond Ambulance Authority (RAA), on the other hand, is a relative newcomer as a municipal EMS provider with a charter that dates only to 1991. But in a very short time, they have become recognized not only nationally by being one of less than a dozen services (along with Jersey City) to achieve accreditation from both the Commission on Accreditation of Ambulance Services (CAAS) and the National Academy of Emergency Dispatch (NAED) but garnered international recognition as well. By leveraging this investment, Richmond has chosen to promote its EMS and medical institutions as an engine of health care practice and innovation in a 2013 plan “The Future of Health Care in the Richmond Region” that seeks to drive innovation throughout the region in collaboration with the state to influence the creation of new models in health care delivery around the world. Already, the idea of EMS as Competitive Economic Advantage is inspiring hope.

The basic question in disagreement between these cities who have both built similar successful systems, is whether EMS is fundamentally a “service” simply to be provided as cost effectively as possible, or is it an “asset” that could be nurtured not only for the health of its people but for the very health of its future economy as well. It appears that these two cities may choose different paths and only some future hindsight will give us vision as to which made the better choice.

1 Comment

  • Skip Kirkwood says:

    Or is it a commodity to be auctioned off to the highest bidder.

    Why do cities do things like this? Because they can! Nobody outsources police or fire, because it is built in to city charters and such. A few years back, an NJ town wanted to outsource its PD to a private security firm. Guess what – the attorney general said “not legal.”

    We need to spend some time assuring that EMS has legal status, and is not just a political object for bargaining. For that we have to work together.

    Well….I guess that possibility is dead….

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

background image Blogger Img

High Performance EMS

High Performance Emergency Medical Services (HP-EMS) systems provide effective clinical care promoting positive patient outcomes and community wellness while maintaining a focus on improving economic efficiency of the system.  This site is dedicated as a community seeking to increase agency performance by promoting useful information regarding the developing trends and improvements in the efficiency of delivering basic and advanced medical care in the field.

Comments
Joey
Static v. Dynamic: A Continuum of Cost
There are pros and cons with each model but the bottom line comes down to optimizing your EMS system and delivering rapid care within a cost efficient model. I have always worked in a drama series called "housewives of a static system" as well as in a nationally recognized dynamic system and I can honestly…
2014-08-26 06:31:07
David
Static v. Dynamic: A Continuum of Cost
John Brophy is that you.... If having a sustainable funding source , money for research, proper equipment like power cots, video laryngoscopes, state retirement, community education funding, and not eating and pooping in a gas station makes me Emergency. Then Rampart I need orders for a lobotomy. If running more calls to bill Medicare and…
2014-08-23 18:41:36
David
Is ‘SSM’ Still a ‘Bad Idea’?
If it's such a great idea why hasn't Fire Dept embraced it?
2014-08-23 14:19:25
Todd
Static v. Dynamic: A Continuum of Cost
David...I agree with John and Roger. EMS is a business and we've got to start treating it that way. The days of sitting around the station waiting for a call have come and gone. To be efficient you've got to be out in your service where the calls happen. This is the future of EMS…
2014-08-23 13:55:46
John
Static v. Dynamic: A Continuum of Cost
I thought Johnny and Roy retired in the 70's. People with a mindset like yours are what keeps the paramedicine profession from evolving like the other emergency services have. The definition of insanity...doing the same things over and over expecting something different to happen.
2014-08-23 10:53:29

Dale Loberger's Discussions


Follow Dale Loberger

FireEMS Blogs eNewsletter

Sign-up to receive our free monthly eNewsletter

LATEST EMS NEWS

HOT FORUM DISCUSSIONS