Category Archives:

Static v. Dynamic: A Continuum of Cost

Entry Img

In our recently published book, “Dynamic Deployment: A Primer for EMS“, John Brophy and I established a dichotomy between the standards of static deployment and dynamic deployment in the very first chapter.  Fortunately, that strong polar perspective has spurred some interesting discussions for me. While the check-out lane analogy was effective in distinguishing some of the differences of static […]

Could Busier be Better?

Entry Img

There is plenty of talk about “evidence-based procedures” in EMS lately. Well, today I read an interesting article that shows a link between being busier and better patient outcomes. Okay…, now after reading that statement, what just happened to your heart rate? Was your automatic response to click the link in order find fault so you can dismiss the finding, […]

Is ‘SSM’ Still a ‘Bad Idea’?

Entry Img

Ideas often take time to saturate a market. Even if the idea is generally recognized as a good one, complete with compelling evidence, change can still take time.  As a current example, how many agencies still have a protocol for complete spinal immobilization on a long spine board for “any fall” or “significant impact”?  On that very […]

Quick Thoughts from NENA 2013

Entry Img

Okay, now that you know what really happened [at the NENA 2013 conference], here is my take.

Quick thoughts from TriCON 2012

The theme for the TriCON 2012 conference in San Diego was Breaking Barriers and that is certainly what TriTech presented during the plenary yesterday regarding their next generation dispatch system and their consolidation of recent business acquisitions. The crowd was clearly the biggest ever for this conference at about 430 users. A show of hands […]

A Bibliography on EMS in a State of Change

Make no mistake, reform is coming to EMS! Federal health care reform is one factor driving changes in EMS, but there are many other factors affecting the future of emergency health care delivery that aren’t getting as much press attention even though their impact is at least as important. This post is an attempt not to repeat what others have said but to place it all in context with references to some of the best articles I have found on the topic.

HP-EMS Profile: Cetronia

Entry Img

The increasing demand for healthcare services which threatened their ability to maintain response times is another example of what motivates the Cetronia mindset of continual improvement and motivating them to become a High Performance EMS.

Response Time Zero

Entry Img

The best possible response time for any emergency is immediate. This is no simple theoretical goal, but a physical reality everywhere that a Public Safety Dispatcher,using standardEmergency Medical Dispatchprotocols,can be reached by phone. These calm “voices of hope”quickly perform an initial triage to determine the type of medical or trauma situation being reported, dispatch appropriate […]

The Role of Response Time in EMS Performance

Entry Img

While there were many comments on the question of “what does High Performance EMS mean to you?”, I would like to focus on the assertion that measuring response time is not an evidence-based practice.

background image Blogger Img

High Performance EMS

High Performance Emergency Medical Services (HP-EMS) systems provide effective clinical care promoting positive patient outcomes and community wellness while maintaining a focus on improving economic efficiency of the system.  This site is dedicated as a community seeking to increase agency performance by promoting useful information regarding the developing trends and improvements in the efficiency of delivering basic and advanced medical care in the field.

Comments
Joey
Static v. Dynamic: A Continuum of Cost
There are pros and cons with each model but the bottom line comes down to optimizing your EMS system and delivering rapid care within a cost efficient model. I have always worked in a drama series called "housewives of a static system" as well as in a nationally recognized dynamic system and I can honestly…
2014-08-26 06:31:07
David
Static v. Dynamic: A Continuum of Cost
John Brophy is that you.... If having a sustainable funding source , money for research, proper equipment like power cots, video laryngoscopes, state retirement, community education funding, and not eating and pooping in a gas station makes me Emergency. Then Rampart I need orders for a lobotomy. If running more calls to bill Medicare and…
2014-08-23 18:41:36
David
Is ‘SSM’ Still a ‘Bad Idea’?
If it's such a great idea why hasn't Fire Dept embraced it?
2014-08-23 14:19:25
Todd
Static v. Dynamic: A Continuum of Cost
David...I agree with John and Roger. EMS is a business and we've got to start treating it that way. The days of sitting around the station waiting for a call have come and gone. To be efficient you've got to be out in your service where the calls happen. This is the future of EMS…
2014-08-23 13:55:46
John
Static v. Dynamic: A Continuum of Cost
I thought Johnny and Roy retired in the 70's. People with a mindset like yours are what keeps the paramedicine profession from evolving like the other emergency services have. The definition of insanity...doing the same things over and over expecting something different to happen.
2014-08-23 10:53:29

Dale Loberger's Discussions


Follow Dale Loberger

FireEMS Blogs eNewsletter

Sign-up to receive our free monthly eNewsletter

LATEST EMS NEWS

HOT FORUM DISCUSSIONS